Choosing the right car for the first time can be daunting, especially when comparing popular models like the Mazda 3, Honda City, and Mazda 2. This detailed comparison will help first-time buyers understand the differences and make an informed decision.

Price and Ownership Costs

Mazda 3

  • List Price: 669 million VND (standard model)
  • On-Road Price: Approximately 760 million VND

Mazda 3 2024

Honda City

  • List Price: 529 million VND (standard model)
  • On-Road Price: Approximately 600 million VND

Mazda 2

  • List Price: 479 million VND (standard model)
  • On-Road Price: Approximately 550 million VND

Detailed Analysis:

  • The Mazda 3 is the most expensive both in terms of list price and on-road costs, reflecting its more premium positioning.
  • The Honda City strikes a balance between affordability and features, making it a mid-range option.
  • The Mazda 2 is the most affordable, appealing to budget-conscious buyers.

Engine and Performance

Mazda 3

  • Engine Options: 1.5L or 2.0L SkyActiv-G
  • Power: 110-153 hp
  • Transmission: 6-speed automatic

Honda City

  • Engine: 1.5L i-VTEC
  • Power: 119 hp
  • Transmission: Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)

Mazda 2

  • Engine: 1.5L SkyActiv-G
  • Power: 109 hp
  • Transmission: 6-speed automatic

Detailed Analysis:

  • The Mazda 3 offers the most powerful engine options, with its 2.0L variant delivering up to 153 hp, suitable for those who prioritize performance.
  • The Honda City’s 1.5L engine with 119 hp provides a good balance of power and efficiency, making it versatile for various driving conditions.
  • The Mazda 2, with its 109 hp engine, is designed for efficiency and urban driving, making it the least powerful but also the most fuel-efficient option.

Fuel Consumption

Mazda 3: 7.0-7.5 L/100 km
Honda City: 6.0-6.5 L/100 km
Mazda 2: 5.5-6.0 L/100 km

Detailed Analysis:

  • The Mazda 2 leads in fuel efficiency, making it ideal for those who prioritize lower running costs.
  • The Honda City offers a middle ground with decent fuel efficiency.
  • The Mazda 3 consumes more fuel, particularly the 2.0L variant, due to its higher power output.

Design and Dimensions

Mazda 3

  • Design: Modern and sporty with sleek lines and a premium feel.
  • Dimensions: Largest among the three, offering more space.

Honda City

  • Design: Elegant and stylish, suitable for both urban and highway driving.
  • Dimensions: Medium-sized, balancing space and compactness.

Mazda 2

  • Design: Compact and dynamic, perfect for city maneuverability.
  • Dimensions: Smallest, making it easy to park and navigate through tight spaces.

Detailed Analysis:

  • The Mazda 3’s larger size provides a more spacious and comfortable interior, but it may be less convenient in tight urban settings.
  • The Honda City’s dimensions strike a balance, offering enough space while remaining manageable in cities.
  • The Mazda 2’s compact size is its strength, making it the easiest to handle in congested areas.

Interior and Comfort

Mazda 3

  • Interior Quality: Premium materials, luxurious feel.
  • Features: 8.8-inch touchscreen, premium Bose audio system, dual-zone automatic climate control.

Honda City

  • Interior Quality: Comfortable and spacious.
  • Features: 8-inch touchscreen, standard audio system, automatic climate control.

Mazda 2

  • Interior Quality: Simple and functional.
  • Features: 7-inch touchscreen, standard audio system, automatic climate control.

Detailed Analysis:

  • The Mazda 3 offers a high-end interior with premium materials and advanced features, providing a luxurious feel.
  • The Honda City’s interior is spacious and comfortable, with features that cater well to everyday needs.
  • The Mazda 2’s interior is more basic but functional, focusing on practicality rather than luxury.

Safety and Driver Assistance

Mazda 3

  • Safety Features: i-Activsense suite, including lane-keeping assist, emergency braking, blind-spot monitoring.

Honda City

  • Safety Features: Honda Sensing, including lane-keeping assist, emergency braking, adaptive cruise control.

Mazda 2

  • Safety Features: Basic safety features like ABS, EBD, BA, airbags, and traction control.

Detailed Analysis:

  • The Mazda 3 and Honda City both come with comprehensive safety packages, making them suitable for safety-conscious buyers.
  • The Mazda 2 provides essential safety features, which are adequate but not as advanced as the other two models.

Driving Experience

Mazda 3

  • Steering: Responsive and sporty.
  • Suspension: Smooth and comfortable for various road conditions.

Honda City

  • Steering: Light and comfortable.
  • Suspension: Firmer, offering sporty handling.

Mazda 2

  • Steering: Light and easy to maneuver.
  • Suspension: Firm, ideal for urban driving.

Detailed Analysis:

  • The Mazda 3 provides a more engaging and sporty driving experience, with responsive steering and a balanced suspension.
  • The Honda City offers a comfortable drive with a firmer suspension that adds a sporty touch.
  • The Mazda 2 is the easiest to drive in city conditions, with light steering and a firm suspension that suits urban roads.

Space and Practicality

Mazda 3

  • Space: Spacious interior, suitable for small families.
  • Cargo Capacity: 444 liters.

Honda City

  • Space: More spacious, ideal for larger families.
  • Cargo Capacity: 536 liters.

Mazda 2

  • Space: Limited, best for individuals or small families.
  • Cargo Capacity: 280 liters.

Detailed Analysis:

  • The Honda City offers the most interior and cargo space, making it ideal for families.
  • The Mazda 3 provides ample space and a large trunk, suitable for small families.
  • The Mazda 2 has the least space, which is sufficient for individuals or small families but may be limiting for larger loads.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Mazda 3

  • Advantages: Modern design, high-quality interior, advanced safety features.
  • Disadvantages: Higher price, higher fuel consumption.

Honda City

  • Advantages: Reasonable price, spacious interior, fuel-efficient.
  • Disadvantages: Less luxurious interior compared to Mazda 3.

Mazda 2

  • Advantages: Affordable, fuel-efficient, easy to drive.
  • Disadvantages: Limited space, fewer high-end features.

Detailed Analysis:

  • The Mazda 3 excels in design, luxury, and safety but at a higher cost and fuel consumption.
  • The Honda City balances cost, space, and fuel efficiency well, though its interior is not as luxurious as the Mazda 3’s.
  • The Mazda 2 is the most budget-friendly and fuel-efficient but offers less space and fewer features.

Conclusion and Recommendations

Choosing the Right Car

  • Mazda 3: Ideal for those seeking a modern design, luxurious interior, and advanced safety features. Suitable for small families or individuals who prioritize performance and luxury.
  • Honda City: Best for families needing space, fuel efficiency, and a reasonable price. It strikes a balance between affordability and features.
  • Mazda 2: Perfect for first-time buyers with a limited budget who prioritize fuel efficiency and easy maneuverability in urban settings.

Comparison Table

Feature Mazda 3 Honda City Mazda 2
Price (VND) 669 million 529 million 479 million
On-Road Price (VND) 760 million 600 million 550 million
Engine 1.5L/2.0L SkyActiv-G 1.5L i-VTEC 1.5L SkyActiv-G
Power 110-153 hp 119 hp 109 hp
Transmission 6-speed automatic CVT 6-speed automatic
Fuel Consumption (L/100 km) 7.0-7.5 6.0-6.5 5.5-6.0
Dimensions (L x W x H mm) 4660 x 1795 x 1440 4440 x 1694 x 1477 4320 x 1695 x 1470
Cargo Capacity (liters) 444 536 280
Interior Quality Premium Comfortable Functional
Safety Features i-Activsense Honda Sensing Basic Safety Features
Driving Experience Sporty, responsive Light, sporty Easy to drive, firm suspension

Final Recommendations

When choosing between the Mazda 3, Honda City, and Mazda 2, consider your primary needs and budget. Test-driving each car can provide a better understanding of which model best suits your preferences.

Key Takeaways

  • Mazda 3: Offers the best in terms of design, luxury, and advanced safety features but at a higher cost.
  • Honda City: Balances cost, space, and fuel efficiency, making it a great all-around choice.